From the monthly archives:

December 2010

Many people ask me whether or not visual facilitation is distracting to delegates.

The short answer is a loud and emphatic, ‘NO!!!’

The long answer is probably best addressed by Tom Wujec from Autodesk, delivering a TEDTalk in February 2009:

In a nutshell, he shows us how information entering the eye is processed ACTIVELY by the Primary Visual Cortex. This first port of call for light tells the brain simple things about geometry. But it ALSO coordinates information with around 30 or so OTHER parts of the brain, leading to ‘Aha!’ moments in lacing information together.

One of these other parts is the VENTRAL STREAM. This detects WHAT something is.

A second communication flow lands up in the DORSAL STREAM. This locates something in physical space. WHERE something is.

A third activation takes place in the LIMBIC SYSTEM. This is an ancient part of our brains, and it handles emotion, feeling.

Any visual stimulus activates those three subsystems (along with many others). This activation process is ongoing during a graphic facilitation. It works on three levels…

  1. Images clarify.
  2. They make the brain interact with concepts.
  3. And they augment our memory through visual persistance.

A big THANK YOU to @JeanneDP on Twitter for the link to Tom’s video.

{ 0 comments }

Graphic facilitation isn't harmed by a bit of showmanship sometimes. Depending on the needs of the client. The client in this case wanted visual facilitation within a James Bond themed evening.

Graphic facilitation isn't harmed by a bit of showmanship sometimes. Depending on the needs of the client. The client in this case wanted visual facilitation within a James Bond themed evening. The key is getting a really tight brief from the client. Knowing what kind of illustrations they need. The pictures have to do a lot of work after the event. Which means they have to stand on their own feet.

A friend has been conversing with me in email about the practicalities of graphic facilitation. One of his questions was this: ‘Does the digital aspect enhance the visual facilitator’s creativity?’

I suspect this answer will vary between different practitioners.

I’ll dodge and enhance the question by changing its terms of reference…

Digital Works For Me… AND For My Clients

For me, it would be almost inconceivable working non-digitally. I’ve done it. And the results were good. But my experience of the process was not so good.

Painting my illustrations digitally makes it possible for me to do a significant amount of pre-production. I can set up different backgrounds for different parts of the talk. I can create icons that can become part of my visual vocabulary, which I can insert at will. This means that the client gets much more value out of me than if I were working in an analogue medium.

While doing graphic facilitation on my tablet pc, I feel no pressure about mistakes. I can erase or undo at will. And this adds an element of suspense and even humour for people watching the stuff I’m painting. If I work on paper, I’m pretty much committed to whatever errors I make. Which puts pressure on things.

On a personal level, my creativity is certainly enhanced by the colours and tools available to me. I’d be hesitant to work with messy magic markers and smeary paper.

The Goal of a Graphic Facilitation: Making the Content Memorable for Onlookers

However, I need to question the value of ‘creativity’ in visual facilitation. The objective of a good visual facilitation is to provide each delegate with a memorable visual interpretation of a session.

Is there a link between ‘memorable’ and ‘creative’? Probably. But not *necessarily*. My mission is not to be creative in the room. It’s to make the material vivid and memorable.

I’ve worked with a speaker who has been humiliated by an overly creative visual facilitator. The artist was intent on making funny pictures rather than enhancing the content of the talk.

The speaker told me that while he was making points that usually brought solemn reflection and tears, this particular audience was roaring with inappropriate laughter. Laughter at the expense of the speaker, cos the ‘artist’ was turning everything into gags.

A visual facilitator is not the star of the show. The material delivered by the speaker is the star.

Deliver the Material (But Avoid Stick Figures)

I focus on the delivery and enhancement of the material, not on the creativity.

I’ve done some ‘uncreative’ yet memorable visual facilitations that clients and delegates have loved. If the material is the hero, people love the pics. At the same time, they’re not hiring me to draw stick figures.

{ 0 comments }

Is Visual Facilitation enhanced by using digital tools?

by Roy Blumenthal on December 23, 2010

All of the stuff I carry with me to ensure a great experience for my visual facilitation clients.

A good digital visual facilitation session requires more than just a tablet pc. This is my toolkit 'checklist' to make sure I have everything with me in my kitbag.

A friend of mine recently asked me whether a tablet pc enhances the visual facilitation/graphic facilitation experience for delegates. There are two ways of doing visual facilitation… digitally (on a tablet pc, or using a Wacom tablet), or analog (using paper and pen).

I work almost exclusively on my tablet pc, and I have many reasons for doing so.

These are some of the factors I’ve found that make the digital experience better for the delegates and for my clients…

1. It’s projected big. As big as the speaker’s PowerPoint. Which means that the visual facilitation is hierarchically equivalent to the PowerPoint.

2. It’s interactive. The speaker is able to address the visual facilitator live, and ask for things. This keeps the room very much alive.

3. It’s exciting for delegates to see a work-in-progress unfolding before their eyes. It literally keeps people awake and on the edge of their seats.

4. Seeing it unfold live during the talk creates multiple and ongoing *productive* cognitive dissonance. Delegates brains are *always* engaged, wondering ‘what’s next?’, ‘how does this picture resolve?’, ‘does the visual facilitator’s interpretation of this point match my own?’

5. The live unfolding of the pictures makes the take-home digital painting deeply meaningful, and already-familiar. A ‘traditional’ visual facilitator working on paper at the back of the room will photograph or scan the pic. And send that to the client. When delegates finally see those images, the topic is long-cold. And the images are new to them. They have no cognitive investment in the images. With the live version, delegates are *part of* those pictures. They *participated* in the generation of the pics. So they recognise them.

6. There are multiple NLP-anchor-points in a live visual facilitation. Because of the ongoing cognitive dissonance, delegates also experience ‘aha!’ moments, which ‘attach’ to parts of the painting and associate with the points being made. The points become meaningful to the delegate.

7. The digital experience is also very colourful. This is in contrast to the paper-based visual facilitator’s limited palette. Also, the digital illustration style can be varied tremendously due to the range of digital tools available to the visual facilitator.

8. The digital visual facilitator is able to zoom in and out of his or her picture, helping delegates to focus on specific points. And the digital canvas size can be varied. Also, things can be moved, erased, emphasised.

{ 0 comments }

Doodle Using ‘SketchBook Mobile Express’ For Android

December 21, 2010

Doodle Using ‘SketchBook Mobile Express’ For Android, originally uploaded by royblumenthal. I’ve been yearning for a decent drawing app for my Android phone (I have an HTC DESIRE). MAGIC DOODLE was the closest I was able to get to actually USING the phone for drawing. But it had too many drawbacks for it to become [...]

Read the full article →

Jennifer Mosaic — Made Using Free Foto-Mosaik-Edda

December 13, 2010

Jennifer Mosaic — Made Using Free Foto-Mosaik-Edda, originally uploaded by royblumenthal. Pretty damn impressive free software! Makes a database of all the pictures you want to include in your mosaics. Then assembles them to create a picture out of your source pic. Fricking amazing. http://www.sixdots.de/mosaik/en/.

Read the full article →